Quote:
Originally Posted by exnewhydeparkcap
dont forget a pre plan is a heads up for us. things change day to day. you could pre plan on monday and on friday the building could be sold and changed by sunday. pre plan helps us out alot and i comend us who do it but dont ever treat a pre plan as gospel treat as the enquier ( but never newsday ) use teh TOH, TONH, TOB or the FM the more info the better but the big key is it can all change in 24 to 48 Hr with out notice
|
your post has (imo) a great deal of merit...
sometimes, pre-plans are done in a tactical fashion, as in: oh, it's a Sunday morning and 5 degrees out, so let's do a pre-plan instead of a drill...
But pre-plans really need to be part of a strategic process, not a tactical time filler. A good pre-plan would extend beyond just defining obvious risks in a current occupancy, but also questions like: who owns the structure? what are lease arrangements? How long will the current occupancy most likely continue?
All of that should be entered into a database that would include a realistic estimate (rather than an automatic one) as to when the pre-plan should be revisited; that date should be entered into the database, and a process to review the pre-plan at that time should exist.
A long time ago, on a galaxy far away, I was my company's OIC for a fire in an abandoned storage building at a defunct construction company. We were advised by radio of some really potent hazmats recorded by prior preplans in that structure. We all laughed, because we knew that pre-plan was seriously outdated and that long ago, those hazmats were removed, and the only thing left on those shelves were rat feces.
But I remember thinking after the call, what if it had been a structure where the situation was reversed, and what was recorded on a preplan as rat feces was now a seriously dangerous chemical?
So, I passionately believe pre-planing is critical, but to do it right, you need an impeccable process to keep it current.